home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT3215>
- <title>
- Dec. 11, 1989: Marriage To The Bitter End
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Dec. 11, 1989 Building A New World
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- CINEMA, Page 93
- Marriage to the Bitter End
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Richard Schickel
- </p>
- <qt> <l>WAR OF THE ROSES</l>
- <l>Directed by Danny DeVito</l>
- <l>Screenplay by Michael Leeson</l>
- </qt>
- <p> Everything has come up roses for the Roses. Oliver (Michael
- Douglas) has made partner at his influential law firm. Barbara
- (Kathleen Turner) has converted her catering service from
- busywork to flourishing business. The kids are trouble free and
- accepted by all the right schools. The last expensive antique
- has been placed in the last empty space in their exquisitely
- restored house. In other words, disaster now looms.
- </p>
- <p> For the habit of discontent has been the engine driving
- their lives. And the only thing left to be discontented about
- is contentedness. Suddenly Barbara can't stand the way Oliver
- chews his food. Or his insistence on correcting the details when
- she tries to tell dinner-party stories. When he suffers what at
- first looks like a heart attack -- it turns out to be a hiatal
- hernia -- she cannot quite make it to the emergency room to fake
- anxiety and sympathy. That night, she proposes separation.
- </p>
- <p> So far, so realistic. One imagines them heading for the
- sort of civilized divorce settlement that people with a fair
- amount of community property to protect generally work out. No
- such luck for the Roses. All kinds of good luck for moviegoers
- willing to follow director Danny DeVito and screenwriter Michael
- Leeson down an increasingly dark and comedically dangerous path.
- The problem is their house, symbol of everything they have
- struggled to achieve. Barbara is willing to forgo alimony if she
- can keep it. Oliver is ready to pay her almost anything if he
- can have it. His lawyer (nicely played by DeVito) discovers an
- obscure statute under which they can divorce yet continue to
- live under the roof on which they have lavished their truest
- love.
- </p>
- <p> This is a terrible idea, an invitation to declare a war of
- attrition. It opens at a level just beyond practical joking: he
- saws the heel off every shoe in her closet; she totals his
- collection of Staffordshire. Soon enough, fires are started.
- And not long thereafter, the situation turns life threatening,
- first to household pets caught in the cross fire, then to the
- combatants.
- </p>
- <p> What is wonderful about the film is that the filmmakers are
- no more willing to compromise their black comic vision of
- marriage than the Roses are willing to compromise their
- differences. Both ends are pursued to a conclusion that is
- bitter, surprising and utterly logical. But it is the style with
- which this wild farce is developed that sustains our horrified
- interest and keeps us laughing as the darkness gathers around
- Barbara and Oliver.
- </p>
- <p> DeVito's transformation of a sun-splashed showplace into a
- haunted house is admirable, and so is his pacing. Turner is,
- needless to say, beautiful when she's angry -- sinuous,
- calculating, purring before she pounces. Douglas makes
- something equally good of the self-righteousness and self-pity
- with which some males exercise territorial imperatives. And both
- contrive to suggest that their warfare is a kind of perverse
- courtship, a form of preening designed to achieve a surrender
- that goes far beyond the sexual. You can take or leave the
- implication that all marriages (and all divorces) may have that
- as their ultimate goal. But it would be wrong to ignore a film
- that blends incautious comedy and cautionary morality so
- expertly.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-